Figg v. Mayo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth District, Sacramento County. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCrockett, J.
This is an action to recover the north half of a square or block of land situate in the City of Sacramento, between N and O and Eleventh and Twelfth streets. The action was tried before the Court without a jury; and judgment having been rendered for the defendants on the findings, the plaintiff has appealed on the judgment roll alone. He claims that, on the facts as found by the Court, the judgment ought to have been for the plaintiff; and this is the only question for our decision.
*264Amongst the facts, the Court finds that the premises in controversy are included in a grant from the Mexican…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Reynolds v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Weisshand v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Fontaine v. Southern Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Peter v. StephensMontana Supreme Court · 1891
- Watson v. BucklerOregon Supreme Court · 1896