Legal Opinion

People v. Cheeks

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 18, 1984No. 83SA127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

The People appeal the Pueblo District Court’s ruling that the prosecution’s designated representative was not exempt from sequestration. 1 We disapprove the ruling.

I

The defendant, Calvin C. Cheeks, was charged with first-degree sexual assault. At his trial, the district court ordered sequestration of the witnesses. The prosecution designated Sandra Wells, an investigator who worked on the case, as its representative under CRE 615(2). 2 The prosecution stated that she might be called to testify for impeachment or rebuttal pur poses, and moved to exempt her from the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos Manuel Parodi, United States of America v. Edwin Barton Conway, United States of America v. Robert Lee LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  2. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Edmund EdinboroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
  4. United States v. William ShearerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Ronald Louis JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Russell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Douglas v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. MelendezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  5. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Ortiz TiradoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API