Legal Opinion
Battista v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1999No. 97-56747PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Sandra Kay Battista and other former employees (collectively “Battista” or “employees”) of the Bank of Newport (“Bank”) appeal an order of the district court that permitted the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to pay a judgment to the employees in receiver’s certificates rather than in cash. The employees also appeal the district court’s refusal to award prejudgment interest. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
The Bank, a financial institution insured by the FDIC, had a severance policy that provided severance and separation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sandra Kay Battista v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Prior v. Tri Counties Bank (In re Prior)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2014