Legal Opinion

Cynthia Maguire and Joseph Maguire v. Dr. Clark Taylor, Dds, Md and Quain and Ramstad Clinic, P.C.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 2, 1991No. 90-5581PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Cynthia Maguire and her husband, Joseph Maguire, brought a malpractice claim against Dr. Clark Taylor arising out of facial surgery on Cynthia Maguire. Federal jurisdiction was based on diversity of citizenship, under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1988). The district court granted Dr. Taylor’s motion to dismiss the medical malpractice claims raised by Maguire because the record failed to support the claims. The court held that Maguire could not establish negligence and could not rely on res ipsa loquitur to establish negligence under North Dakota law. Maguire appeals. We affirm.

Maguire was referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wasem v. LaskowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Lemke v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larsen v. ZarrettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Haugen v. BioLife Plasma ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Serocki v. Meritcare Health SystemDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2004
  4. Kunze v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API