Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Dixon

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1903Published

Action by a receiver . appointed in supplementary proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

¡Rogers, J.

¡March 30, 1903, Patrick Caulfield recovered a judgment against the defendant, Thomas H. Dixon, in the ¡Municipal Court of the city of Syracuse for $345.45, damages and costs. A transcript was that day filed in the office of the clerk of Onondaga county, and execution issued by hitm to the sheriff of said county, which was returned unsatisfied April 6, 1903. Supplementary proceedings were then instituted and resulted in the appointment of the plaintiff as receiver, etc., with an allowance of $40 costs. The plaintiff duly qualified as such receiver, gave the necessary bond and on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Putnam v. RitchieNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  2. Green v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Warren v. . Union Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Petrie v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hassard v. RoweNew York Supreme Court · 1851

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API