Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Carlson v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1966PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Chiee Justice BueNett
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The State has moved to dismiss this appeal and affirm the judgment because there are no errors in the technical record and because the plaintiffs in error have failed to file assignments of error' and brief as required by the Rules of this Court, the same being Rules 14, 15(2) and 26. This motion is timely made and must be, and is, sustained.
In addition to the motion though the State has filed a very able and excellent brief in the matter. We, in addition to sustaining the motion above likewise feel for the reasons assigned in this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hughes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- James C. Dillard v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Wilkerson v. BomarTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- Elliott Et Ux. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Reed v. HeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- State v. VasquesTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Teague v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Tommy Nunley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- Freshwater v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Gant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.