United Electric Coal Companies v. Rice
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
In the motion for rehearing counsel have not questioned the basic principles on which the decree for plaintiff is founded, but have strongly questioned some of the findings of fact and, in certain respects, the measure of damages applied by the court. I will notice the contentions that have not been pressed heretofore.
It is urged that the profits shown by the evidence to have been lost during the shutdown of the mine due to defendants’ wrong may not properly be assessed as damages against the defendants; that plaintiff’s damages based upon lost profits should be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Freeport Sulphur Co. v. American Sulphur Royalty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1928
- Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. BarkerTexas Supreme Court · 1928
- Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Stoddard v. Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Julian Petroleum Corporation v. Courtney Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.