Legal Opinion

Norris Candy Co. v. Dixie Highway Express, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1960No. 38495PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

Code § 68-618, providing for substituted service of process on a nonresident motor common carrier not *666having a designated agent to accept service of process, by serving process on the Comptroller General, being in derogation of the common law, will not be extended beyond the mode fixed by the legislature and shall be strictly and literally construed. Williams v. Batten, 156 Ga. 620 (119 S. E. 709); Aldrich v. Johns, 93 Ga. App. 787 (92 S. E. 2d 804); Mull v. Taylor, 68 Ga. App. 663 (23 S. E. 2d 595). The statute does not provide for substituted service by serving a person…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mull v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. Williams v. BattenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  3. Lonkey v. Keyes Silver Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Aldrich v. JohnsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Record Truck Line, Inc. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Record Truck Line, Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API