Legal Opinion
United States v. Abarza
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided November 6, 2015No. 1:14-cr-179-MCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McSHANE, United States District Judge
Defendant Giovani Abarza (Abarza) moves to suppress evidence seized as a result of a traffic stop in Klamath Falls, Oregon. At issue is whether Oregon State *1086Police troopers unreasonably prolonged the traffic stop. Because the troopers lacked reasonable suspicion to continue the traffic stop, and because Abarza did not voluntarily consent to the searches of his person or his vehicle, I grant the motion to suppress.
BACKGROUND
ABARZA IS STOPPED FOR FAILURE TO SIGNAL A LANE CHANGE
The night of Thursday, March 6, 2014, Oregon State Police Trooper (now…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. AbarzaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016