Legal Opinion

George W. Hopkins & Son v. Green

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Manistee. (Judkins, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Action of replevin in justice’s court. Judgment for plaintiffs for two dollars damages. Case taken to the circuit court by certiorari, where the judgment was reversed, and judgment entered for defendant for costs and an attorney fee of $15.

Defendant appeared specially in justice’s court, and moved to quash the proceedings, for the reason that no bond had been filed as required by law. The suit was commenced in the name of George W. Hopkins & Son as plaintiffs. The name of the son was not given either 'in the affidavit, Avrit, bond, or declaration. The' bond Avas executed by George W. Hopkins…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bigelow v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bush v. ShabahangMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API