United States v. McNicol
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to construe and apply 31 U.S.C. § 3713 (commonly known as the federal priority statute). We conclude that the statute says what it means and means what it says. Since the court below accorded the statute its plain meaning and applied it in that manner, we affirm that court’s entry of judgment in favor of the United States.
I. BACKGROUND
We start with a sketch of the factual background and travel of the case. Robert Reitano died in July of 2002, survived by his wife (appellant Marci McNicol) and four minor children. At the time of his death, Reitano…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Torres v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Summers v. City of FitchburgCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Tanco-PizarroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Martin v. Tricam Indus., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Acosta v. World Marble and Granite Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Clark v. Portfolio Recovery AssociatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.