Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. Zimmerman
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 25, 2020No. 3:17-cv-01230-BAS-AHGUnknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAIRO CERVANTES RAMIREZ, et Lead Case No.: 17-cv-1230-BAS-AHG al., Consolidated with: 18-cv-1062-BAS-AHG 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RULE 37 SANCTIONS 14 SAN DIEGO POLICE CHIEF 15 SHELLY ZIMMERMAN, et al., [ECF No. 128] 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Rule 37 Motion. ECF No. 128. 19 Plaintiff seeks sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 against all 20 Defendants for various alleged discovery violations under Federal Rule of Civil…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kitsap Physicians ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- R & R Sails, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gomez v. Stop & Shop Supermarket Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.