Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Chicago & Northwestern R'y Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from PowesMele District Court. Action to recover for services and meals furnished nurses and others in attendance on an employe of the defendant, who was injured in an accident on the defendant’s road, and for ties furnished and delivered. Trial by jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

i railpany^l sur-m' ft“tobiualor' company. I. There was evidence tending to show that one Ira Iiusted, an employe of the defendant, was injaired an accident, for which it may be assumed the defendant was responsible. At his own request he was taken to the plaintiff’s house. The acei¿¡ent occim,e(j on gunqay; and Hosted died on the next Saturday. Dr. J. B. Cox was in the employ of the defendant as its surgeon, and the evidence tended io show that he agreed that the defendant would compensate the plaintiff for taking care of Iiusted, and for meals furnished nurses and others. There was no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayberry v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Talley v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Pieart v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
  3. Pfannebecker v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Carson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. McDonald v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API