Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Rogers

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 27, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of tke United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.'

This is an appeal by the Metropolitan National Bank of Pittsburgh from a decree of the circuit court for the western district of Pennsylvania (47 Fed. Rep. 148) dismissing a bill filed by Reuben Miller, Jr., et al., assignees in bankruptcy of William Rogers and Thomas J. Burchfield, to set aside a conveyance of 10 acres of land made by the bankrupts to Mary Ann Rogers, wife of said William Rogers.

*777Tlio Tbill was filed 141.li December, 1877, and alleged the plaintiffs were assignees in bankruptcy of said Rogers & Burchfield, who were the owners of the property in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Crawford v. NealSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Adams v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co. v. Beckwith MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. Gill v. Benjamin Franklin Realty & Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
  3. Hazelwood Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  4. Bartol v. Walton & Whann Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
  5. Tate v. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API