Legal Opinion

Kihlken, Admr. v. Barber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1935No. 25139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The Court of Appeals found that the only reversible error arises out of the portion of the general charge respecting the issue of contributory negligence of plaintiff. It thereby found that there had been no prejudicial error respecting the issue of the defendant’s negligence and that that issue had been submitted to the jury entirely free from prejudicial error. The record discloses no substantial error in the submission of this case which could possibly have been prejudicial to the plaintiff. Recognition of and adherence to the “two issue rule” required an affirmance of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. MastersonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Keatts v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  3. Moody v. VickersOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Wiles v. MahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Wiles v. MahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API