Legal Opinion

Woolfe v. Ohio Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 12, 1923No. 3730Published

1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The trial court sustained the motion of the defendant for a directed verdict upon the sole ground that the evidence disclosed the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. Evidence was introduced on the part of the defendant tending to prove that the plaintiff could have oiled this engine with safety to himself by stopping it during the oiling operation and starting it'again after the oil had been supplied; that the engine could have been stopped by giving a quarter turn to the lever of the gas valve to shut off the gas and almost…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API