Legal Opinion

Detroit & Cleveland Nav. Co. v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 29, 1944No. 4259PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs are common carriers of motor vehicles by water upon the Great Lakes, authorized as such by the Interstate Commerce Commission under § 309(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C.A. § 909(a), and were protestants in hearings before the Commission upon the application of the defendant steamship companies, to operate as common carriers of motor vehicles between Detroit, Michigan, and ports on Lake Erie and Lake Superior. The hearings resulted in an order of the Commission granting a certificate of convenience and necessity to the defendants under § 309(c)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Texas & Pac. Ry. v. Gulf, Etc., Ry.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Merchants Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. N. E. Rosenblum Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Detroit & Cleveland Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API