Legal Opinion
Crisp v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 20, 1997No. CV-F-96-6308 OWW SMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY SUBMITTED ON JURISDICTION TO HEAR CONVERSION-TYPE CLAIM; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ADD NEW PARTIES
WANGER, District Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
On December 4, 1996, Plaintiffs Gilbert Mark Crisp and Rhonda Crisp (“the Crisps”) filed a complaint against the government, alleging that the government has no valid lien claims against them based on income tax deficiencies. In a Memorandum Opinion filed on February 25, 1997, the government’s motion to dismiss was granted with leave to amend. The Opinion asked for supplemental authority regarding subject…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arizona Civil Liberties Union v. DunhamDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1999