Legal Opinion

United States v. James Wormick, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 2, 1983No. 81-2617PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction on five counts of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1341 through a mail fraud scheme designed to defraud State Farm Insurance by the submission of false automobile accident and theft claims. For the reasons below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

The evidence adduced at Wormick’s trial, taken in the light most favorable to the government, indicates that Wormick was involved in an insurance fraud scheme involving at least ten persons. Wormick’s role, as a police officer in Dixmoor, Illinois, was to supply falsified police reports, for a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Morgan v. ForetichCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. State v. DolinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United States v. Thomas YorkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Alan ShacklefordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API