Szegda v. Szegda

Our Supreme Court has explained that “the paramount purpose of a property division pursuant to a dissolution proceeding ... is to unscramble existing marital property in order to give each spouse his or her equitable share at the time of dissolution.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation *440marks omitted.) Greco v. Greco, 275 Conn. 348, 355, 880 A.2d 872 (2005). The majority affirms the trial court’s financial orders in the dissolution of the thirty-four year marriage of the parties. I respectfully disagree because, in my view, the plaintiff, Janet L. Szegda, has not received her equitable share…