Legal Opinion

Avery Power MacHinery Company v. McAdams

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, O. J.,

('after stating the facts.). Appellants seek: to reverse the decree upon the authority of Wheeler & Motter Mercantile Co. v. Knox, 136 Ark. 95, 206 S. W. 46, and Falls v. Driver, post p. 703, in which it was stated that the court adheres to the doctrine that the real estate of an intestate descends directly to the heirs upon the death of the ancestor, subject to the statutory exceptions, and that there is no statute incumbering an heir’s interest in real estate with his indebtedness to Ms ancestor. In other words, it may be stated as the settled rule in this State that, except…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cummings v. BramhallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Allen v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Stenson v. H. S. Halvorson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Holt v. LibbySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  5. Baker v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1901

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Thompson v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. In Re Estate of SheelerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Stanton v. StantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Blocker v. SchererSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API