Legal Opinion

Cathedral Square Partners Ltd. Partnership v. South Dakota Housing Development Authority

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided March 30, 2009No. Civ. 07-4001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAWRENCE L. PIERSOL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, Cathedral Square Partners Limited Partnership, West Park, Ltd., 46th Street Partners Limited Partnership, and Riverview Properties, Ltd., have sued Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, South Dakota Housing Development Authority (“SDHDA”), alleging that SDHDA breached their Housing Assistance Payment (“HAP”) contracts which were established and are administered pursuant to Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937. SDHDA’s alleged breach stems from administering these HAP Contracts in accordance with the 1994…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cathedral Square Partners Ltd. Partnership v. South Dakota Housing Development AuthorityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
  2. Cathedral Square Partners Ltd. Partnership v. South Dakota Housing Development AuthorityDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2012
  3. Village West Associates v. Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Evergreen Square of Cudahy v. Wisconsin Housing & Economic Development AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015
  5. Zastoupil v. Government/MilitaryDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API