Legal Opinion

City of Bristol v. Town of Bluff City

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 21, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANKS, Judge.

In this annexation dispute the principal issue is whether the town of Bluff City timely questioned the legality of the city of Bristol’s annexation. The Trial Judge at the behest of Bluff City held under the Declaratory Judgment Act that the city of Bristol’s annexation was illegal and void.

Pertinent to the issues herein, Bristol passed on first reading an ordinance annexing along Highway HE on September 5, 1989. The annexation ordinance was not challenged and became effective on October 19, 1989. On October 17, 1991, Bluff City undertook to revive its annexation of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Watauga v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Southerland v. Town of GreenevilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Town of Oakland v. Town of SomervilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API