Legal Opinion

State v. 1987 Chevrolet Camaro

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KLEINER, J.A.D.

This appeal presents the question of whether a trial judge presiding in the Law Division, Special Civil Part, abused her discretion in dismissing with prejudice the in rem forfeiture complaint filed by plaintiff, the State of New Jersey, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:64-1 et seq. seeking forfeiture of claimant Allen L. Schaefer, Jr.’s 1987 Chevrolet Camaro Z-28 for failure to answer interrogatories.

Claimant has filed a cross-appeal contending that the motion judge erred in failing to dismiss plaintiffs forfeiture complaint on grounds of double…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF TOWN OF MORRISTOWN v. LittleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Hodgson v. ApplegateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  5. Jansson v. Fairleigh Dickinson UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. James AME Dev. Corp. v. Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  2. Adedoyin v. Arc of Morris CountyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
  3. TRUST CO. OF NJ v. SliwinskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  4. STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FRANK CAMPIONE AND HOWARD KATZ (18-05-0685, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API