Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 10, 1975No. 73-594PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

305 So.2d 826 (1975)

Doris Jane MILLER, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 73-594.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 10, 1975.

Edward F. Keezel, II, and Emmett A. Moran of Emmett A. Moran, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Michael M. Corin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Thomas M. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

Upon a review of the briefs, the record on appeal and having heard oral argument, we are of the opinion that appellant has demonstrated reversible error with respect to the proposition…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Saunders v. BoyerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  2. Keezel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. White v. BuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Potts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API