Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Miller v. Thompson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1924No. Civil No. 2051Published

1ConcurrenceLyman, J.

(Concurring). — This action is to foreclose a chattel mortgage. The issues of fact were submitted to a jury on a single interrogatory, which was answered favorably to the defendant. The court, treating this verdict of the jury ,as advisory only, rendered judgment for the plaintiff. Authority to do so is found in chapter 125 of the Session Laws- of Arizona of 1921, which reads as follows:

“Section 1. That paragraph 542, chapter XIV, part II, of title YI, Bevised Statutes of Arizona, 1913, Civil Code, entitled ‘Civil Procedure’ be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows:
“542. In all…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Perego v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Brown v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API