Legal Opinion
Praisner v. State
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 3, 2020No. SC20315PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN J. PRAISNER, JR. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT (SC 20315) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Vertefeuille, Js.* Syllabus Pursuant to statute ((Rev. to 2013) § 53-39a), ‘‘[w]henever, in any prosecution of an officer of the Division of State Police . . . or a local police depart- ment for a crime allegedly committed by such officer in the course of his duty as such, the charge is dismissed or the officer is found not guilty, such officer shall be indemnified by his employing governmental unit for economic loss sustained by him as a result of such prosecu- tion . .…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. State Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Reliance Insurance v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Town of Middlebury v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Feehan v. MarconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Rivas v. N.Y.S. LotterySupreme Court of the United States · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clark v. Waterford, Cohanzie Fire Dept.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2023