Vale v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error;, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of having possession of whisky and her punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 90 days.
Upon application for search warrant by the affidavit of George P. Long, a search warrant was duly issued, and! the officers conducting the search found three quarts of whisky in room 3 of the Aimeda rooms. The defendant was conducting said rooming house at the time and was found in the room where the whisky was seized. The officers arrested the defendant; she was convicted of having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Penrod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Klaber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
- Archer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
- Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Burkes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.