Legal Opinion

Vale v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1929No. A-6540PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error;, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of having possession of whisky and her punishment fixed by the jury at a fine of $150 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 90 days.

Upon application for search warrant by the affidavit of George P. Long, a search warrant was duly issued, and! the officers conducting the search found three quarts of whisky in room 3 of the Aimeda rooms. The defendant was conducting said rooming house at the time and was found in the room where the whisky was seized. The officers arrested the defendant; she was convicted of having…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Penrod v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Klaber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Day v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Archer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Burkes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API