Tennent-Stribling Shoe Co. v. Roper

McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.

This is substantially the same case that was before us at our last term, under the then title of “D. W. *41Miller and H. J. Roper v. Tennent-Stribling' Shoe Company.” The consideration we then gave it, and our decision therein, are shown in the report of that case as it appears in 119 Fed. 865, 56 C. C. A. 377. It is unnecessary to restate the facts of the case, which sufficiently appear in that report. Of the numerous errors then assigned, this court considered only the first, namely, that the Circuit Court erred “in overruling claimants’ written motion to discharge the…