Legal Opinion

Smith v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1921No. 11273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action on contract; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. December 15, 1919.

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. In a bilateral contract of sale an obligation by the seller to deliver to the buyer by a certain date a gross quantity of a certain commodity for a certain estimated price, as “ 1000 gross of round quart bottles . . at the rate of $1.80 per gross,” but which must be delivered in certain stipulated quantities periodically ar certain designated periods, is entire, and a failure by him to make any one of the deliveries at the time agreed upon amounts to a breach of the entire obligation and gives to the buyer the right to elect and bring suit before maturity for such damages as he may have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Henderson Elevator Co. v. North Georgia Milling Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Phosphate Mining Co. v. Atlanta Oil & Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Central Georgia Brick Co. v. Carolina Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Upholstering Co. v. LiebermanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Hagood v. DIXSON COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API