Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfredo Gracidas-Ulibarry

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2000No. 98-50610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

231 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir. 2000)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ALFREDO GRACIDAS-ULIBARRY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 98-50610

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted En Banc June 20, 2000

Filed November 7, 2000

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Steven F. Hubachek, Julie A. Blair, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for the defendant appellant.

Roger W. Haines, Assistant United States Attorney, Larry A. Sebastian, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Criminal Division, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. David RicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API