Hamilton v. Ames
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This is an action in assumpsit, brought >upon a lease by which on April 29, 1879, Hamilton, Gerrish & Co. leased to the Temple Manufacturing Company for the term of 10 years a portion of block 344 in the city of Muskegon, describing the same by metes and bounds. The Temple Manufacturing Company covenanted in the lease to pay an annual rental of $150, and—
“All and every description of legal taxes and assessments which may accrue against said, leased premises during the continuance of this lease.”
The plaintiff became the assignee of Hamilton, Gerrish & Co., and the defendants the assignees of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Holcomb v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Auditor General v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Deloria v. Van WinkleMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Holcomb v. BullockMichigan Supreme Court · 1958