Legal Opinion

Lee Brick & Tile Co. v. United States

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided October 1, 1990No. C-89-908-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RUSSELL A. ELIASON, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiff Lee Brick and Tile Company, Inc. moves to compel discovery prior to being required to respond to defendant’s motion to dismiss. The defendant (government) contends such discovery is unnecessary, seeks a protective order against answering it or against further discovery and requests that plaintiff respond forthwith to the motion to dismiss. The resolution of this discovery dispute cannot be made without first taking a peek at the merits of the underlying controversy.

I. Factual Background

Plaintiff filed a refund claim for federal…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gay v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Ronald G. Davis v. R. F. ZahradnickCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Edward J. AhrensCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Estate of Leonard A. Wood, Deceased, J.M. Loonan, Personal Representative v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maine Medical Center v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. BoyceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. L & H Co., Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. Maine Medical Center v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011
  5. James Issac Faulk v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API