Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rodriguez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1982No. 2428PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Jorge Rodriguez was tried in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia and found guilty of indecent exposure and corrupting a minor. A petition for certiorari on the grounds that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions was dismissed by the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, and this appeal followed. We *351agree that the Commonwealth’s evidence was insufficient and, therefore, reverse.

In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, the test is whether, accepting as true all the evidence of the Commonwealth and all reasonable inferences arising…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. BurtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. MummaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MeszarosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. ZellnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AsburySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. Brettman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County2009
  3. Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API