Legal Opinion
Ross v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 19, 1984No. 83-2137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In view of the State’s concession, we reverse and remand for correction of the sentence to reflect concurrent mandatory minimum sentences for the two sexual batteries and consecutive mandatory minimum sentences for the robbery and kidnapping. Appellant need not be present. The judgment and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and BARK-ETT, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986