Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Climenti

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1926No. Appeal 37PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The appellant, Sam Climenti, is the licensed proprietor of a public! billiard and pool room and bowling alley in the borough of Zelienople. He was charged with violating the provisions of the Act of July 17, 1917, P. L. 1037, which forbids any such proprietor knowingly permitting any person under the age of eighteen years to be present in his billiard and pool room or bowling saloon; and upon a hearing had before a justice of the peace he was convicted and fined $25, “by process of summary conviction,” as provided in said act. He applied by petition to the Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. PrestonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Allegheny County v. HendleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  3. Commonwealth v. SpottsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. RalstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Com. of Penna. v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Commonwealth v. PalmsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Commonwealth v. PeacockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Marsh v. LindseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Commonwealth v. FreedmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API