Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (1998)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided November 18, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Senator Brown,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Opinion asking, in effect, the following questions:
1. Under 19 O.S. 1991, § 863.13[19-863.13], may county governments zoneconcentrated animal feeding operations?
2. May vertically integrated poultry and swine companies operatein the State under 18 O.S. Supp. 1998, § 954(3)?
I
¶ 1 The Oklahoma statutes break down the counties of the State into several categories for the purpose of specifying the extent of a county's zoning power and the manner in which this power is to be exercised. The provisions relating to counties…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holly Farms Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- University Life Insurance Company of America v. Unimarc Ltd. And George C. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Freeform Pools, Inc. v. Strawbridge Home for Boys, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Stevenson v. Bd. of Adj., City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.