Legal Opinion

In re: S.F.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 3, 2022No. 10/21PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In Re: S.F., No. 10, September Term, 2021. Opinion by Hotten, J. CIVIL PROCEDURE – APPEALS – MOOTNESS A case is moot when “at the time it is before the court, there is no longer an existing controversy between the parties, so that there is no longer any effective remedy which the court can provide.’” Bd. of Physician Quality Assurance v. Levitsky, 353 Md. 188, 200,

725 A.2d 1027, 1033

(1999) (citations omitted). This Court has discretion “to express [its] views on the merits of a moot case . . . in instances where[] the urgency of establishing a rule of future conduct in matters of important…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Lloyd v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  2. In re: D.E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  3. Syed v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API