Legal Opinion

T.P. W.R.R. v. Ill. Commerce Com.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1940No. 25990. Appeal DismissedPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a motion by appellees to dismiss this appeal or in the alternative for extension of time to file briefs. The ground for dismissal urged is that the appeal was not perfected within sixty days after the entry of the order or judgment of the trial court, as required by section 69 of the Public Utilities act governing appeals from orders of the Illinois Commerce Commission. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 111 2/3, par. 73.

Appellant replies that the Civil Practice act has superseded section 69 of the Utilities act, and that by section 76 (1) of the Civil Practice act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hudson v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People ex rel. Hines v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  4. City of Breese v. AbelIllinois Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Village of South Elgin v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Summers v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Caparra Country Club v. Junta de Planificación de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  4. Caparra Country Club v. Puerto Rico Planning, Urbanizing & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  5. Summers v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API