Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murray v. SERVALL SERVICES, INC.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2010No. 09-CA-107Published

1DissentWicker, J.

| |I respectfully dissent from the majority because in my view the judgment is an impermissible partial judgment for which the law does not authorize an immediate appeal.

In this matter, the employer appeals a judgment that determines the employee is permanently totally disabled and is entitled to benefits from August 18, 2005 through the present and continuing. The *442judgment also finds that the claimant is entitled to medical expenses. Further, the judgment states that it can be modified if the claimant’s condition improves. Finally, the judgment allows the employer a credit for any benefits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. UNR Home ProductsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Volion v. Baker Heritage, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Beaumont v. Exxon Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Marquez v. JACK USSERY CONST.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Flach v. Diebold, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API