Trailer Convoys, Inc. v. Holsclaw
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1DissentOsborne, Judge
The majority opinion herein is a classical example of the position that a court can reach when it refuses to follow any predetermined rule of law. We have reasoned from case to case in this field with disregard for the statutes and legal principles which should be controlling until now we find ourselves awarding compensation for the death of an employee because per chance he just happened to have a cerebral hemorrhage while on the job. To me the majority opinion gives the impression of being a studied effort in avoiding a serious legal discussion of the rule of law governing this type of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Phil Hollenbach Co. v. HollenbachCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Jellico Coal Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Grimes v. Goodlett and AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SextonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Adams v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.