Legal Opinion

In Re MacK

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided October 8, 1991No. Bankruptcy 91-04370-BKC-6C7 through 91-04376-BKC-6C7, 91-04573-BKC-6C7 through 91-04579-BKC-6C7PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER STRIKING PAPERS, REQUIRING AMENDMENTS, AND REQUIRING FURTHER SECTION 341 MEETING

C. TIMOTHY CORCORAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

THESE Chapter 7 cases came on for consideration of the legal sufficiency of the form and content of the petitions and other papers filed in these cases.

F.R.B.P. 1002(a) and F.R.B.P. 1007(b) require that a debtor file a petition and prescribed schedules and statements. Official forms of the petition, schedules, and statements establish their form and content. Although F.R.B.P. 9009 permits flexibility in the arrangement of the contents and allows combinations of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re AshUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re OrrisonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2006
  2. In Re CoyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2005
  3. In re ClausenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API