Legal Opinion

State v. Sandifer

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided August 22, 1997No. 96-2211PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

Richard Sandifer appeals the judgment and sentences entered upon his convictions. He argues the sentencing court failed to exercise its discretion with respect to the imposition of fines.

Scope of review. Our scope of review for defects in a sentencing procedure or for a sentence outside statutory limits is for corrections of errors at law. State v. Thomas, 547 N.W.2d 223, 225 (Iowa 1996). We will not disturb a sentence on appeal unless the defendant shows an abuse of the trial court’s discretion or a defect in the sentencing procedure. State v. Loyd, 530 N.W.2d 708, 713 (Iowa…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. State v. LoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  3. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. State v. KrivolavySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  2. Jenna Sondag v. Orthopaedic Speciatists, P.C. and John Hoffman, M.D.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2025
  3. State of Iowa v. Noah Riley CrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  4. State of Iowa v. Noah Riley CrooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  5. State v. CullumCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API