Legal Opinion

David Culp and Paul Miller v. Patrick Keohane

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 21, 1987No. 86-5118PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This pro se habeas corpus appeal was timely filed by David Culp and Paul Miller, both federal prisoners at the correctional institution in Memphis, Tennessee. This case has been referred to a panel of this Court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs of the parties, this panel agrees unanimously that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

The petitioners allege that statutory good time credits and extra good time credits they earned during their original prison terms were improperly forfeited by the United States Bureau of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas Dewey Lambert v. Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, and the United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States ex rel. Del Genio v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  3. Sidney Ray Wilkerson v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  4. James Theodore Bentsen v. G. A. Ralston, Jr., Warden, United States Medical Center for Federal PrisonersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis L. Boniface v. P.M. Carlson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Rasco v. BeelerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. Tyrone Thompson v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API