Harden v. State Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the superior court for Klickitat county, Darch, J., entered June 15, 1920, upon findings favorable to the plaintiffs, in an action to recover property belonging to an estate, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
— By this action the plaintiffs sought to recover from the defendant possession of four promissory notes, and mortgages securing the same, or, if the defendant had collected any of the notes, then judgment for the amount so collected. All of these notes were made payable to Ada S. Clark. The makers were Schurtz and wife, Forbes and wife, Peterson and wife, and Yates. At the trial it appeared that the respondent held the Schurtz and Forbes notes and mortgages, but that the Yates and Peterson notes had been collected while in its possession. The court gave judgment requiring the defendant to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. AyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Wickersham v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Weider v. OsbornOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
- Winningham v. HollowaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. MerrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Lucky Calendar Co. v. CohenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Bostock v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Cummings v. LoweIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Hill Syrup Co. v. National City Bank of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.