Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 20, 1996No. 2-95-097-CRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOLMAN, Justice.

Appellant Danny Wayne Johnson was found guilty by a jury of aggravated sexual assault, with an affirmative finding that a deadly weapon had been used. Johnson appeals his conviction raising three points of error: 1) the trial court erred by not completing a hearing on his motion for new trial that was interrupted because of a bomb scare; 2 & 3) the trial court erred by sustaining the State’s hearsay objections to testimony offered by Johnson. We affirm.

In his first point of error, he contends that the “trial court erred by refusing to complete a hearing on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StaceyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Whitmore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Eddlemon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Cobb v. GodfreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  2. Parmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Ryan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996
  4. Shaffer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  5. Greenwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API