Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Lewis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 18, 1986No. 85-1761Published

1Concurrence

JORGENSON, Judge,

specially concurring.

I agree that an affirmance is in order and that no Brady violation occurred. The appellant, Roger Dean Lewis, cites the failure of the state to share with him statements made by police officers in 1981 at the pretrial confession of Anthony J. Fernandez, a co-perpetrator of the crime for which Lewis was convicted. According to Fernandez the officers made statements to the effect that, “We don’t want you.... We want [Lewis].” This information came to light in 1984 when Fernandez gave a sworn statement to Lewis’s counsel informing him of the officers’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. Kevin v. Leroy and John Hitchings, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API