Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Gleason

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 21, 1925No. 10943. [fn*]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

The Dorsey Lumber & Rig Company, hereinafter called “the rig company,” erected for Ii E. Wilcox two oil well derricks, furnishing all the material and labor therefor. The two rigs were known and designated as the Wilcox-Keithley rig No. 1, and the Wilcox-Keithley rig No. 2. The No. 2 rig was sold by Wilcox to M. R. Hemphill, who removed it from the Keithley farm in Stephens county, on which farm Wilcox owned an oil lease. The rig company filed and recorded in.the office of the county clerk of Stephens county a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien on both rigs prior to the sale of rig No. 2 to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas Trammell & Co. v. MountTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Pool v. Wedemeyer & SchulteTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Williams v. MagouirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Meyers v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ferguson v. Ashbell & SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Oil Field Salvage Co. v. SimonTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Upham v. Boaz Well Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Sprowls v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. W. L. MacAtee & Sons, Inc. v. HouseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  5. Lee C. Moore & Co. v. Jarecki Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API