In re Jackson

Respondent was temporarily suspended from the practice of law on March 12, 1986. The Panel recommended that respondent be disbarred. The Executive Committee voted unanimously to adopt the Panel’s findings of fact and con-*36elusions of law. Its independent recommendation was that respondent be disbarred. We agree that disbarment is the appropriate sanction.

The instances of misconduct addressed in this disciplinary matter began in 1972 and continued until respondent was suspended in March 1986. Nine different complaints were filed against the respondent and some of the complaints included more…