Legal Opinion

Borough of Wanaque v. North Jersey District Water Supply Commission

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided June 2, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quinn, President.

Petitioners seek an increase in the assessed valuation of the land of the respondent, situated in the petitioner taxing district, and there assessed for taxes for the year 1940 in the sum of $162,900, or at an average valuation of $100 per acre for the property involved. The prayer of the petitions is for an increase of the assessment to the sum of $977,400, or at the rate of $600 per acre. The individual petitioner is a taxpayer of the borough. The respondent is a public agency of New Jersey, organized and existing under the provisions of R. 8. 54:5-1, et seq.; N. J. S. A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  2. Essex County Park Commission v. Town of West OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. Borough of Emerson v. State Board of Taxes & AssessmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. People Ex Rel. Lehigh Valley Railway Co. v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Fidelity Trust Co. v. VogtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of East Orange v. TP. OF LIVINGSTONNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Hackensack Water Company v. Borough of Old TappanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. In Re Tax Assessments Against Pocahontas Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hackensack Water Company v. Borough of Old TappanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API